QBD approves settlement despite evidence of Capacity to Litigate

19 Mar, 2019
 image

Settlement of cases involving borderline capacity can sometimes raise difficult issues. In a case heard in the Queen's Bench Division on 18th March 2019 the medical evidence suggested that the claimant had capacity to litigate, with appropriate help, but lacked the capacity to handle a large award of damages. The claimant thus appeared to be a protected beneficiary, but not a protected party under CPR 21.

The parties reached agreement on a settlement figure, but the defendant was concerned to ensure that the settlement was binding, and the Court of Protection had made no finding as to capacity. In order to achieve a settlement Master Thornett agreed to approve the settlement without determining the issue of capacity, applying the decision of Teare J. in the Admiralty Court in Coles v Perfect [2013] EWHC 1955.

Grahame Aldous QC and Nicolas Hillier acted for the Claimant instructed by Shoosmiths.

 

Contact us

For more information please call our clerks on
020 7832 0500 or Email »

Follow us

twitter   linkedin   rss

Subscribe to our updates

Subscribe email

Search